Re: [Tails-dev] service-wrapper-java in Debian

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Author: Rémi Debay
Date:  
To: tony mancill
CC: tails-dev
Subject: Re: [Tails-dev] service-wrapper-java in Debian
Hi

I tested it using experimental, I ll get more feedback if it is on unstable.

I don't know the process to make a package going from experimental to sid.
What shoud I do ?


Rémi Debay



On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:44 AM, tony mancill <tmancill@???> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Given that the reason the package was uploaded to experimental was
> because it was during the freeze, I don't see a reason why we shouldn't
> go ahead and upload to unstable. Any concerns with that?
>
> Cheers,
> tony
>
> On 09/13/2011 03:52 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Rémi Debay wrote (13 Sep 2011 10:32:45 GMT) :
> >> I did not get any user feedbacks for this package.
> >
> > You might get some from us soon. If you don't, you can assume the
> > packages currently in Debian experimental work well enough for our I2P
> > users: no news is good news!
> >
> >> I know I2P doesnt use the debian package but one downloaded from
> >> mainstream.
> >
> > I think I2P uses whatever libraries you throw at it. As long as
> > service-wrapper-java is concerned, we (Tails) throw your packages from
> > Debian experimental at it, not the PPA. (BTW, why not setup a
> > packaging team with the persons who have been doing their own stuff
> > in a PPA?)
> >
> >> I may update the package by november.
> >
> > This would be most welcome. Do you envision an upload to unstable at
> > some point?
> >
> > Bye,
> > --
> > intrigeri <intrigeri@???>
> > | GnuPG key @
> https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
> > | OTR fingerprint @
> https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
> > | So what?
>
>
>