Author: sajolida Date: To: Public mailing list about the Tails project Subject: Re: [Tails-project] #8948: Reconsider the terminology around
"persistence"
segfault: > sajolida:
>> [...]
>> I tried to rewrite our examples with "Persistent Storage" and it was
>> pretty easy to do. See:
>>
>> https://tails.boum.org/contribute/how/documentation/style_guide/persistent_storage/ >
> I like it!
>
>> We also considered "Persistent Memory", "Persistent Volume", "Persistent
>> Drive", "Persistent Vault", and "Persistent Locker" but both Cody and I
>> preferred "Persistent Storage".
>
> I agree, "Persistent Storage" feels like the best option - although I
> also like "Persistent Volume" for being a bit more technically precise,
> but "Storage" is probably easier to understand for users who are not
> technically experienced.
Exactly! I'm really happy I have your green light, segfault :)
