Re: [Tails-ux] User testing of the installation assistant, …

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Author: Giorgio Maone
Date:  
To: sajolida, Tails user experience & user interface design, u, tchou
Subject: Re: [Tails-ux] User testing of the installation assistant, ISO verification extension, and Tails Installer in Debian
/sajolida:
/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Giorgio Maone:
>
> >/Nevertheless by November 7 I'm going to update: />//>/1) issue #8567, attaching the XPI to be tested />/2) issue #9387 attaching a sample HTML installation page including the />/browser detection code and the relevant customizable HTML elements to />/implement the installation/verification process according to />/https://labs.riseup.net/code/attachments/download/921/extension-20150828.fodg
> /
> Great! You should base your work on [1] but surely adapt it to your
> needs whenever needed.

I've actually been working on a "download-inline" HTML file I've found
in tchou's git repository and just slightly adapted (to be
wiki-independent) at

https://maone.net/dev/tails/download.html

The prototype you linked,

https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/bootstrapping/extension/prototype/

does not seem to differ wildly, so I guess they're both going to work as
long as element IDs don't change.

tchou: what's the most updated reference you've got for me to test?

Speaking about tests, I was starting to check actual URLs from
tails.boum.org, also to be sure the extension-provided
certificate-pinning machinery worked as expected with the *real*
certificate data.

I'm currently letting the extension be triggered by any
https://tails.boum.org/* page where a <div id="extension-version">
exist, but I couldn't find any

https://tails.boum.org/install/v1/Tails/i386/stable/latest.yml

to be fetched as referenced in

https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/bootstrapping/extension/#index8h1

What URL(s) should I actually hard-code into the extension before
releasing it?

Thanks!

-- G