[Tails-dev] Camouflage: left to do [was: Please review and m…

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Author: Alan
Date:  
To: tails-dev
Old-Topics: Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/6342-update-camouflage-for-gnome3
Subject: [Tails-dev] Camouflage: left to do [was: Please review and merge feature/6342-update-camouflage-for-gnome3]
Hi,

> These are now merged and in the 1.1~beta1 release.
>

Thanks.

> I've looked at all these tickets, closed/updated them as necessary,
> and created a few new ones. These tickets describe my vision of what
> the theme should look like in 1.1:
>
> #7316: Fix system tray icon size in camouflage mode


I worked on this several hours. There is a CSS property in Adwaita
theme, but that doesn't work.

I also tried to add margin and padding to basically all panel elements
without success. I doubt this is possible with wheezy version of
gnome-panel without patching it.

Do we think it is a blocker? If yes, do we accept to build a custom
gnome-panel package?

> #7325: Fix application icons in "task list" in Windows 8 camouflage


I'll investigate that.

> #7326: Fix systray icons in Windows 8 camouflage


Looks doable. Please show me the desired icons if possible.

> #7328: Make clock applet font white again in Windows 8 camouflage.
>

Done.

> These four are just straight up coding tasks.
>
> #7277: Port camouflage to Gnome 3 panel
>
> This one I just don't understand. Please clarify, preferably on the
> ticket!
>

Done. I think we should close this one, but let you decide.

> #7274: Decide if torbrowser camouflage is still needed
>
> IMHO our decision should be "yes", but only some for the basics.
> Low-hanging fruit.
>

Then we should define what we want to achieve and what "the basics" are.

> #7312: Include window-picker-applet
>
> For this one I created the following blocking ticket:
>
> #7327: Remove launchers in Windows 8 camouflage?
>
> And IMHO "yes we should", for the reasons stated on the ticket.
>

I think the lack of icon at startup is worse than the duplication of in
icon added to the worse UX. But that should be discussed.

> Assuming we can reach consensus on the decisions/discussion quickly,
> do you think you'll be able to get most of this done by June 10, so
> any remaining smaller issues from an initial review at that time can
> be fixed until June 15?
>

Yes but the systray icon size.

Cheers