Re: [Tails-l10n] [review](de) wiki translation download page

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Author: flapflap
Date:  
To: tails-l10n
Subject: Re: [Tails-l10n] [review](de) wiki translation download page
flapflap:
> Hi,
>
> please review branch nivatius-download
>
> d0c7ab9 (de) wiki download page: flapflap's last fixes
> a4e2238 (de) wiki download page: second review by u. and flapflap
> b4c3761 (de) wiki download page: review by u.
> 3544740 (de) wiki download page: review by flapflap
> cfacb37 (de) wiki download page: poedit file header
> 9e0c797 Merge branch 'master' into nivatius-download
> d69bb27 (de) wiki download page: some minor fixes
> a7429cc (de) wiki download page: poedit header update (nivatius)
> 62e384f (de) wiki download page: lots of translated strings (nivatius)
> a0815be (de) wiki download page: use formal 'Sie' instead of 'du' (nivatius)
> d1663c2 (de) wiki translation for download page, minor fixes
> 4bebd7a (de) wiki translation for download page from nivatius
>
> in flapflap/tailsxlat.git
>
> some notes for clearity how it came to this confusion:
> - commit 3544740 has already been reviewed by u. [0]
> - commit b4c3761 was then added by me following some of u's suggestions
> in [0] (those that were clear to me). I wasn't sure with some changes
> and made some comments/proposals in [1]
> - commit a4e2238 contains the results for my questions in [1], so
> basically it's my proposals that were ACKed by u. and u's proposals [2]
> - before sending the pull request, I did a last build and review and
> found again (1) a wrong word, (2) a typo, and (3) a grammar error. I
> fixed it in commit d0c7ab9 and discribed it in [3]; then, sent the pull
> request without someone to review this last commit. That was a bad idea,
> I now know... Won't happen again!
> - meanwile, u. has reviewed that commit d0c7ab9 in [4], but u. and
> intrigeri requested a new call for review in [6][5]. So that's why I
> call again for review, and hope that this removes the confusion. The
> previous pull request is of course invalid now.
>
>
> [0] https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-l10n/2014-April/001063.html
> [1] https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-l10n/2014-April/001065.html
> [2] https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-l10n/2014-April/001066.html
> [3] https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-l10n/2014-April/001075.html
> [4] https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-l10n/2014-April/001080.html
> [5] https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-l10n/2014-April/001082.html
> [6] https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-l10n/2014-April/001081.html
>
> Cheers and again sorry for the confusion I caused,
> ~flapflap


ping?
(don't want to hesitate, just remind)