Hi,
anonym wrote (28 Dec 2013 17:25:37 GMT) :
> 27/12/13 18:05, intrigeri wrote:
>> I've pushed a few minor improvements on top (oh crap, I realize I've
>> done this in feature/spoof-mac, which is the right place IMO, but not
>> the way you've been doing it — I'm sorry).
> The reason I wanted to have the design in our master branch and not the
> feature branch was to make it available on our website so it can be
> linked to in the call for testing. Like in your CFT for incremental
> updates I want to urge people with "security auditing skills" to have a
> look at the design, and I think they'd be encouraged better like this
> compared to linking to the raw markdown in git.
I see, and I think you're totally right. If you want, I'll cherry-pick
the relevant commits into master later today or tomorrow. Shall I?
>> (I would personally have done this in two steps, first issuing a clear
>> call for testing on tails-dev, and second a broader public call for
>> testing, but well, I guess it's too late now, so go, go, go! :)
> Ok. Why? To catch show stoppers before the public call?
Yes. AFAICT, only you and me have tested this code so far, on a pretty
limited range of hardware. Anyway, here we go, fingers crossed :)
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
