On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:36:29PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bertagaz@??? wrote (17 Dec 2013 18:10:18 GMT) :
> > Congrats, I'm excited to see this coming in the wild!
>
> :)
>
> ... and I'm scared to discover the remaining bugs we've missed :]
>
> >> Next steps:
> >>
> >> * bertagaz reviews feature/incremental-upgrades-integration (but does
> >> not merge it yet) and hopefully ACK's it; ETA?
>
> > I'll try to do that tomorrow if I have remaining time after the other
> > review'n'merge I have planned to do, but that sounds unlikely, so if not I
> > should be able to do that before the end of the week. I wanted to test
> > this incremental upgrade feature since a while anyway.
>
> IMHO this review (without merge) is higher-priority than the other
> ones you have on your plate (namely: #6477 and #6496).
Ok, then I did test it the way you proposed, and it works great. So I've
marked the ticket QA-Pass, and assigned it to sajolida.
bert.
