On 16/05/13 18:26, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sajolida@??? wrote (15 May 2013 15:43:34 GMT) :
>> So if we want to be a bit more autonomous regarding configuration,
>> team management, etc. we could have our own Transifex project with
>> the same features as they do.
>
>> A drawback would be to stop being in the same project as Tor, and thus
>> have probably less people seeing our files, and tempted to contribute.
>
> Given:
>
> 1. the low number of Git -based translation teams (2)
> 2. the infrastructure setup and maintenance work needed if we want
> to do it ourselves
> 3. the probable loss of translators if we move out of Tor's
> Transifex project
> 4. a good-enough workaround was proposed (Git -based translation
> teams take responsibility to regularly contact Transifex
> translators for their language)
>
> I really don't see why we would bother creating and maintaining our
> own Transifex project. I'm happy to reconsider this once we have half
> a dozen or more Git -based translation teams. But well, if folks
> disagree and want to set up and maintain this thing, I'm fine too :)
That makes total sense.
Then, what shall we do with our other ressources that are not in
Transifex so far? Cf. the thread with winterfairy@???. People
working only on Transifex won't probably never know they exist.
./chroot_local-includes/usr/share/gpgApplet/messages.pot
./chroot_local-includes/usr/share/tails-additional-software/messages.pot
./chroot_local-includes/usr/share/shutdown_helper_applet/messages.pot
./chroot_local-includes/usr/share/tails-security-check/messages.pot
./chroot_local-includes/usr/share/amnesia/messages.pot
./chroot_local-includes/usr/share/tails-about/messages.pot
./chroot_local-includes/usr/share/tails-htp-notify-user/messages.pot
./chroot_local-includes/usr/share/unsafe-browser/messages.pot
./chroot_local-includes/usr/share/tails-virt-notify-user/messages.pot
And some other launchers here and there...
Shall we ask Runa to add them all as well? Shall we select the most
important ones?
