hi,
anonym wrote (07 May 2013 11:23:06 GMT) :
> I redid your survey of all 197 prefs,
Thanks.
> and these are my results that differed for me:
> user_pref("noscript.subscription.lastCheck", -142148139) ==> some type
> of timestamp when we started iceweasel so we can ignore this
Known: already documented in todo/cleanup_iceweasel_prefs.
No blocker IMHO.
> pref("network.protocol-handler.external.snews", false) ==> true
s
news://google.com -> "The address wasn't understood
Iceweasel doesn't know how to open this address, because the protocol
(snews) isn't associated with any program."
Looks good to me.
> IMHO this looks good enough to merge any way, but could you please
> re-check just that last one?
Please merge?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
