Re: [Tails-dev] Tails's plans for Tor's stream isolation in …

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Author: proper
Date:  
To: tails-dev
Subject: Re: [Tails-dev] Tails's plans for Tor's stream isolation in Tor 0.2.3?
<intrigeri@???> wrote:
> proper@??? wrote (11 Jun 2012 22:48:48 GMT) :
> > The open question, which remains... If a user types 'gpg <...>',
> 'wget <...>' or
> > apt-get <...>' in console, how to reinterpret it as "ip=127.0.0.1
> port=9053 uwt gpg
> > <...>" so it's gets it's own SocksPort?
>
> just drop wrappers listed in the $PATH before the "normal" application
>
> (e.g. /usr/local/bin/gpg), that does that, or did I miss something
> obvious that would make the trivial solution not work?


That sounds like a fine solution.

The following test script /usr/local/bin/gpg works.

#!/bin/bash
ip=127.0.0.1 port=9053 uwt /usr/bin/gpg $*

Thanks!

> (OTOH, even with Tor separate streams, I'm not sure Tails will ever
> pretend being able to seriously separate multiple identities used at
> the same time in a given running Tails system.)


You must not support multiple identities.

Separating web, irc, IM, ssh, git, apt-get, etc. is still desirable and the implementation effort manageable.

______________________________________________________
powered by Secure-Mail.biz - anonymous and secure e-mail accounts.