Re: [Tails-dev] Bug#636399: ITP: cookiesafe-lite -- Control …

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Author: Ximin Luo
Date:  
To: intrigeri
CC: 636399, tails-dev
Subject: Re: [Tails-dev] Bug#636399: ITP: cookiesafe-lite -- Control which websites have permission to set cookies.
On 04/08/11 10:22, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ximin Luo wrote (03 Aug 2011 23:12:12 GMT) :
>> one advantage is that cs-lite has, is a load more localisations than
>> cookie-monster.
>
> I see.
>
>> so it might be worth including it in debian for the near future at
>> least, especially since i've already done the packaging for it.
>
> What do you mean by "the near future", especially wrt. Wheezy release?
>
> (
> If cs-lite makes it into Wheezy, we'll have to support it for a few
> years, which is quite a big near future.
> If cs-lite is not intended to go into Wheezy, I doubt it's a good idea
> to push it into sid: it seems to me the purpose of sid is to prepare
> the next Debian release, not to be a storage area for temporary
> packages.
> )
>


cs-lite has been stable for several years now with no major bugs reported that
i can see on the review page.

afaics sid is pretty ad-hoc, e.g. http://packages.debian.org/sid/wine-unstable

we can decide whether to let it propagate to wheezy after it's been around in
sid for a while. i don't think it does any harm letting people try it out.

> Bye,



--
GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE
https://github.com/infinity0
https://bitbucket.org/infinity0
https://launchpad.net/~infinity0