Re: [pragmatique] status update 2017-04-12
|This message is part of the following thread:|
|the complete thread tree sorted by date|
> I believe and understand alternatives are possible, and currently I'm: > - looking into _sane_ maintainer models of companies or groups which > have been around long enough, and evaluating them. > - looking into possible non-profit organization models we could choose > and document them. Evaluate based on the country. The goal is to: > - support the vision and work. support the infrastructure. > pay fair wages to fulltime or otherwise contract involved people > later on. other stuff. The bottom line is work for the public.
> - improve the website: > - A _good_ landing page should lead to subprojects: > - the idea of how I want to implement the translation for websites > should be documented
> - split up the current power structure (see point "maintainer"). As an > anarchist I don't feel comfortable with the orthodox definition of > maintainer. > My idea is to be the name to blame, talk to .. > Organize groups as soon as it's possible. > - which leads to: > - diverge work. this is now and available. I'm currently handling many > jobs in one person and there are 5 months left until I am forced to > slow down (due to university starting. Even though I see a good > future in this project I want to have a formal degree on paper as it > helps, working in Germany).